New Jersey Superior Court grants Firm client Avon Products, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment in talc litigation.

06/15/18

NJ

N.J. Super. Ct. -- New Jersey Superior Court

Toxic Torts & Products Liability

Download

On June 16, 2018, Judge Ana C. Viscomi of the Middlesex County Division of New Jersey Superior Court granted firm client Avon Products, Inc. (“Avon”) summary judgment on all claims alleged against it.  On June 15, 2018, Judge Viscomi had issued a tentative opinion granting Avon’s motion for summary judgment in Martinez.  Rather than request oral argument, Plaintiff agreed to accept Judge Viscomi’s decision.

This is the Firm’s second straight summary judgment win for Avon in as many months after Judge Viscomi granted summary judgment to Avon in Johnson v. American International Industries, et al., on May 11, 2018.

In Johnson, Avon argued that, despite over fifty pages of argument and thousands of pages of exhibits, plaintiff still had failed to provide any direct or circumstantial evidence that the Avon talc product plaintiff used ever contained asbestos.

The same arguments applied in Martinez, where the addition of expert reports still failed to create any triable issues of fact.  Even though Ms. Martinez submitted two opposition briefs, one after briefing had ended to correct many of the errors in her previous brief, Judge Viscomi was unconvinced by plaintiff’s conflation of talc testing from different mines and different manufacturers in its case against Avon.

Avon Products, Inc. is represented by Firm partners Neil Bromberg, Kathryn Jensen, and Ann Marie Duffy and associates Elizabeth Chan and Peter Ellis.

What's
Hot

Bloomberg BNA: Monsanto: Cancer Study Suppression is ‘Scientific Vandalism’

Hollingsworth LLP represents Monsanto in In Re:Roundup Products Liability Litigation in the Northern District of California.