Following the science in this area, as well as working with effective legal counsel, will be important action items for companies in this space.
Congratulations to all of our super lawyers!
“An Update on Regulation and Litigation Concerning PFAS in Biosolids,” Westlaw Today “PFAS in Biosolids: Expanding Regulation and Growing Litigation in 2026,” Wastewater Digest “Expanding State PFAS Regulations Proves Challenging to Business,” Bloomberg Law “What Defense…
The article discusses federal inaction, emerging state regulation, and recent lawsuits including Alessi v. Synagro Technologies, Inc. and Farmer v. EPA, as well as outlining strategies for businesses to manage potential compliance and litigation challenges involving PFAS in biosolids and wastewater.
Businesses that use PFAS or handle related wastewater should be watching recent developments closely to stay ahead of evolving compliance and litigation risks.
Since 2014, Eric Lasker has been advocating for the FRE Rule 702 amendments that went into effect in 2023.
Sebastian and his co-panelist presented on the latest A.I. litigation trends in the U.S. and internationally.
Matthew Malinowski gave an interview to the UCLA Continuing Education of the Bar (CEB) regarding the influential K.G.M. v. Meta Platforms bellwether case.
The firm congratulates our Honor Roll members for their dedicated service to the District of Columbia community.
The firm is delighted to work with and mentor talented law students as they prepare for their future legal careers.
Recent lawsuits target not only wastewater dischargers but also entities involved in biosolids processing and marketing, emphasizing the importance of legal preparedness.
Recent articles and blog posts available to print or download.
The Court of Appeals placed the burden on Travelers to prove which asbestos claims were subject to aggregate limits or any other exclusion or limitation “because certain insurers in the asbestos coverage arena historically destroyed coverage documentation pursuant to an intentional scheme seeking to thwart legitimate claims,” necessitating the reconstruction of potentially applicable coverage by extrapolating from the limited policies available and filling in missing or incomplete provisions.
Relevant circuit court opinions and our key Rule 702 publications available to print or download.
AI companies or those that offer an AI product need to assess their potential product liability-based exposure and work with counsel to explore potential risks and defenses.