Panelists will discuss techniques for eliciting from even seasoned expert witnesses favorable testimony and admissions for impeachment, disqualification, exclusion of testimony, or leverage for settlement negotiation.
The article discusses the importance of judicial gatekeeping and practical considerations for litigants challenging expert testimony.
In this blog post, partner Joe Altieri analyzes these verdicts, what they mean for tech and other industries, the products liability theory driving this new wave of litigation, and how to prepare for what may be coming.
The article highlights plaintiffs’ experts’ continued reliance on “one molecule” or “any exposure” theories in toxic tort cases and addresses several recent litigation developments signaling a growing demand for reliable, dose-specific causation analysis in ethylene oxide cases.
The firms earning the top rankings garnered client recognition for superior client service.
Aleksandra Rybicki and Olivia Sacks analyze a recent Ninth Circuit decision addressing the application of the learned intermediary doctrine to a patient seeing multiple physicians for the same condition.
Panelists addressed the current toxicology, epidemiology, and medical causation evidence with respect to certain PFAS, as well as evidence relating to claims for natural resource damages.
Clients praise the firm for finely honed expertise and successful outcomes in the litigation space, at trials, and on appeal.
Congratulations to all of our super lawyers!
