Cross-Examining the Algorithm: Guardrails for AI-Assisted Expert Opinion
publication | November 2, 2026The article breaks down recent case law, ethical obligations, and what litigators must do to protect their cases.
The article examines how J&J's rigorous application of Rule 702's reliability requirements, combined with a show-cause strategy modeled on a Lone Pine order, helped resolve approximately 70,000 claims, and offers considerations for companies and defense counsel on building an early record around expert admissibility in mass tort matters.
The article explores adding safeguards to protective orders to ensure that confidential materials remain secure in a rapidly evolving discovery landscape.
The article discusses the importance of judicial gatekeeping and practical considerations for litigants challenging expert testimony.
The Rise and Potential Fall of the “One Molecule” Theory in Ethylene Oxide Litigation
publication | July 15, 2026The article highlights plaintiffs’ experts’ continued reliance on “one molecule” or “any exposure” theories in toxic tort cases and addresses several recent litigation developments signaling a growing demand for reliable, dose-specific causation analysis in ethylene oxide cases.
Given the escalating use of generative AI tools in the legal profession, the article recommends steps for counsel to consider when addressing an opponent’s court submissions.
The Supreme Court’s opinion that the “relating to” requirement in 28 U.S.C. § 1442 should be interpreted broadly is an important development that provides a path to federal court for those who meet the necessary criteria.
Products Liability Claims Against Digital Platforms Ignore Arbitration Agreements
publication | June 9, 2026The article discusses key considerations for companies to consider when deciding to litigate or arbitrate these claims. In the appropriate circumstance, arbitration may offer a beneficial alternative to traditional litigation.
Following the science in this area, as well as working with effective legal counsel, will be important action items for companies in this space.
“An Update on Regulation and Litigation Concerning PFAS in Biosolids,” Westlaw Today “PFAS in Biosolids: Expanding Regulation and Growing Litigation in 2026,” Wastewater Digest “Expanding State PFAS Regulations Proves Challenging to Business,” Bloomberg Law “What Defense…
“An Update on Regulation and Litigation Concerning PFAS in Biosolids,” Westlaw Today
publication | May 22, 2026The article discusses federal inaction, emerging state regulation, and recent lawsuits including Alessi v. Synagro Technologies, Inc. and Farmer v. EPA, as well as outlining strategies for businesses to manage potential compliance and litigation challenges involving PFAS in biosolids and wastewater.
Recent articles and blog posts available to print or download.
“PFAS in Biosolids: Expanding Regulation and Growing Litigation in 2026,” Wastewater Digest
publication | April 10, 2026Recent lawsuits target not only wastewater dischargers but also entities involved in biosolids processing and marketing, emphasizing the importance of legal preparedness.
AI companies or those that offer an AI product need to assess their potential product liability-based exposure and work with counsel to explore potential risks and defenses.
“Expanding State PFAS Regulations Prove Challenging to Business,” Bloomberg Law
publication | March 20, 2026The rapid expansion of state laws governing the sale of consumer goods containing PFAS poses compliance challenges and litigation risks for multi-state retail chains, internet retailers, and manufacturers.