Hollingsworth LLP remains dedicated to emphasizing the crucial role federal courts play in screening out speculative science and ensuring that junk science does not reach a jury.
For more than 40 years, corporate defendants have chosen Hollingsworth LLP for our record of winning at trial and on appeal in federal and state courts across the country.
"Impeccable client service requires more than just 24-hour availability and providing sage legal advice and zealous advocacy—it requires a complete understanding of each client's business and core values."
"I believe providing exceptional client service starts with understanding each client's goals, communicating clearly and proactively, and serving as a trusted partner throughout every stage of a matter."
The firms earning the top rankings garnered client recognition for superior client service.
Clients praise the firm for finely honed expertise and successful outcomes in the litigation space, at trials, and on appeal.
Our rigorous hands-on training, means that law students as well as young lawyers are equipped to have greater responsibility in the litigation process earlier in their careers
Gary Feldon spoke with Waste Dive regarding the recent approval of bills setting limits on contamination from per- and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) substances in sewage sludge in Maryland and Virginia.
Congratulations to all of our super lawyers!
Matthew Malinowski gave an interview to the UCLA Continuing Education of the Bar (CEB) regarding the influential K.G.M. v. Meta Platforms bellwether case.
The firm congratulates our Honor Roll members for their dedicated service to the District of Columbia community.
The firm is delighted to work with and mentor talented law students as they prepare for their future legal careers.
Relevant circuit court opinions and our key Rule 702 publications available to print or download.
The editorial advisory boards provide feedback on Law360's coverage and expert insight on how best to shape future coverage.
The brief cautions that without a Supreme Court ruling, “litigants will continue to face uncertainty in how Rule 702 should be applied, admissibility standards that vary by circuit, and the same wayward decisions that necessitated the rule’s amendment.”
