A Washington Legal Foundation Working Paper, co-authored by Stephen A. Klein and Andrew L. Reissaus, this article discusses one of the first cases to address the application of traditional product liability theories in the context of a reprocessed medical device, in which both the original manufacturer and the reprocessor are defendants.
Washington Legal Foundation's Legal Backgrounder (July 22, 2011) (Kirby T. Griffis)
Cover story for The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel by Firm partner Kirby T. Griffis
Washington Legal Foundation's Legal Backgrounder (June 3, 2011) (Matthew J. Malinowski)
Eric G. Lasker Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Backgrounder
IADC's Toxic and Hazardous Substances Litigation Newsletter (Tamara Fishman, December 2010)
LJN’s Product Liability Law & Strategy (May 2010) (Heather A. Pigman)
LJN's Insurance Coverage Law Bulletin (February 2010) (Donald R. McMinn)
An Update on the Environmental Protection Agency’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program, IADC Committee Newsletter (2009)
Defense Counsel Journal 76, No. 3 (July 2009)
LJN's Insurance Coverage Law Bulletin (December 2008) (Donald R. McMinn)
Washington Legal Foundation's Legal Backgrounder 23, no. 37 (August 22, 2008) (Martin C. Calhoun)
