The title of the webinar was Regulation Through Litigation: State Enforcement of Environmental, Products, and Digital Spaces Using Public Nuisance and Consumer Protection Laws.
This seminar brings together leaders from across the defense community to examine the forces driving increased risk and exposure, while identifying practical strategies to respond.
The Supreme Court’s opinion that the “relating to” requirement in 28 U.S.C. § 1442 should be interpreted broadly is an important development that provides a path to federal court for those who meet the necessary criteria.
The article discusses key considerations for companies to consider when deciding to litigate or arbitrate these claims. In the appropriate circumstance, arbitration may offer a beneficial alternative to traditional litigation.
Clients praise the firm for finely honed expertise and successful outcomes in the litigation space, at trials, and on appeal.
Our rigorous hands-on training, means that law students as well as young lawyers are equipped to have greater responsibility in the litigation process earlier in their careers
Gary Feldon spoke with Waste Dive regarding the recent approval of bills setting limits on contamination from per- and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) substances in sewage sludge in Maryland and Virginia.
Following the science in this area, as well as working with effective legal counsel, will be important action items for companies in this space.
Congratulations to all of our super lawyers!
The article discusses federal inaction, emerging state regulation, and recent lawsuits including Alessi v. Synagro Technologies, Inc. and Farmer v. EPA, as well as outlining strategies for businesses to manage potential compliance and litigation challenges involving PFAS in biosolids and wastewater.
Businesses that use PFAS or handle related wastewater should be watching recent developments closely to stay ahead of evolving compliance and litigation risks.
